For those of you not familiar with these documentaries, I suggest you watch them especially if you have any remote interest in the law system or anything of the like. However I must warn you, mainly on the fact that the murder itself, especially in regards to the crime scene photos, is extremely unsettling and not to mention graphic. I barely have the stomach to handle some of the photos, but even if you are squeamish I recommend you still watch these documentaries because they will truly blow your mind, and if you’re like me, possibly get excruciatingly pissed off. They are HBO specials, and you can rent them or netflix them. Now, If you have or have not watched them I am going to elaborate on several reasons as to why this whole situation is upsetting and down right disheartening considering it’s overall shame on our oh so beautiful judicial system. I was 3 years old in 1993, just to clarify things. So I don’t remember this happening, not the least bit. By 2000 I was about 10, and was more into n’sync then trials. I recently had watched Paradise Lost 3, with my family nonetheless, because my mother had told me about Paradise Lost, the original documentary which came out a few years after the first trial, I believe. Upon watching the third one I was of course happy to know that all three men were free, HOWEVER I was really pissed that they still had to admit guilt to this crime that I KNOW they did not commit. I am in no way shape or form an expert on criminal justice, detective work etc etc. I’m a noob, to put it simply. However, after a fairly extensive course of Criminal Evidence, I’d like to say that I know enough to know that those trials were the biggest pots of bullshit ever to be in a courtroom. In addition to several other trials, *cough* O.J Simpson *cough* Kasey Anthony *cough*
Considering the title of that class, CRIMINAL EVIDENCE….Key word being evidence, well, I learned a shit load about evidence. Not to mention I learned of the proper ways to obtain evidence, and by evidence I mean pretty much everything having to do with a legit trial. Because evidence is literally everything, photos, documents, any samples of any kind, any testimonies, alibis, I could totally keep going but then I might as well have authored the damn textbook. What does this have anything to do with the West Memphis Three trials? Well, if you’ve seen the documentaries, then you know, evidence was 100% the main reason behind every single flaw in those trials. First of all, there barely was evidence. Stupid right? Technically there was a lot of evidence, but for all intensive purposes there might as well not have even been any, frankly there might as well have not even been bodies, because it’s not like they took a look at anything like a real investigator would, with scrutiny and precision, nah they just flicked through and went, “Wow, alright, mhmmm…yeah oh guilty totally. Is it my lunch break?” I understand that 1994 was a very long time ago in retrospect. My criminal evidence class was based of a book published in 2009, which still was technically out of date in comparison to even now. So its safe to say that the quality of trials may be generally greater today as apposed to then, but I digress because even now our legal system eats the words ” Everyone is assumed innocent until proven guilty.”
Now, I understand I bounce around a lot, but lets touch on something pretty common that also played a huge part in this saga. Stereotypes, or cliche physical appearance has stricken well, almost everyone in this day and age. The 90’s, well they were awkward and since I was young, I don’t necessarily know that time but I am assuming the era now ( the 2000’s ) is a little bit more drastic on attacking personal choices in regards to appearance, again I am only basing this on MY experience with it. I am not saying in the 90’s this wasn’t an issue, because God knows “looks” have almost always been an issue. And clearly in Damien Echol’s case, it was definitely an issue especially in the public and the laws eye. I was always picked on in junior high and high school, for being different. Of course I wore black, of course I liked death metal and horror flicks. I went the whole 10 yards. I am still an “outcast” due to my tattoos and piercings regardless of their nature. Does this mean I am not loved and appreciated by differing classes of people, no, but it does mean that some people still think I’m a convict, I’ve never been arrested. Some people think I am a drug addict, I’ve never done any drugs. Some people think I worship the devil, I’m a christian and I love God While we’re on that subject, briefly, I’m not a hypocrite nor do I point fingers at any other religion, you believe it what you like, as long as you have faith and are a good person, you have my love and support, no matter what race you are, and no matter what your past holds. All I’m saying is, I know how it feels to be the freak, to be thought of as someone your not. The city of West Memphis Arkansas, in 1994 are 100% guilty of essentially profiling someone based on graffiti with no legitimate ties to them. As far as I’ve seen their names were the only graffiti they are responsible for. So, like most white collar police departments, the first people to blame are well, to put it bluntly, black people or maybe that crazy goth in math class. What I’m getting at is pretty much this, if you look different, you’re subject to a lot of bullshit, and in these three boys’ case, a whole fucking lot of bullshit.
In a nutshell there are a few key reasons to why these trials were bullshit. Shitty experts, which I learned have to have appropriate credentials coming out of their assholes. An absolute lack of real evidence linking any of the three men to the crime, which I learned there has to be some pretty strong stuff to convict. Forced confessions, there’s a whole 3 chapters on confessions and let me tell you the one given by Misskelly was 100% inadmissible. Stereotypes, which lets face it ruins everything for everybody. The overall culprit is lack of experience or even intelligence on behalf of the police department or whatever precinct had jurisdiction of the crime. And the lack of professionalism and yeah, intelligence in regards to the judges, jury and lawyers on this crime. Based on EVERYTHING I learned in my criminal evidence class, there is no way in hell, by the standards of a considerably prestige author of law-based textbooks, that these three men should have been or even could have been convicted. Had the officers done their jobs like the were trained to do, had the detectives acquired real credible experts to analyze evidence , had the judge done his job in admitting when somethings are wrong or something was overlooked, had the lawyers done their jobs in finding every single detail. Had these men and women simply done their jobs which some of them attended years of schooling for, three men would have been saved from 18 years of absolute hell and anguish. I get if some things are expensive, I understand that most trials cost an unbelievable amount of money. What I can’t understand is how so many people could overlook so many important things that can potentially save someones life Its not like they weren’t there out for everyone to see, its that people just looked away or skimmed past it. Then when it comes about, they try their hardest to make sure it cannot bite them in the ass. Nobody likes to admit their wrong. Well nobody wants to be falsely imprisoned for 18 years and suffer the pain that some free schmuck gets to avoid because you were shitty at your job.
So, watch this documentary, scream at your tv, and start supporting the west memphis three. I didn’t touch on everything because literally there is SO MUCH wrong with this case it’s unbelievable. I pray to God these men get exonerated, and that someone decides to re open the investigation piece together what really happened to those little boys.
http://wm3.org/WM3
go there for more information about the case and Jason, Damien and Jesse.